Paying the Orchestra
Wed, 26 Dec 2007, 05:49 pmfunklizard88828 posts in thread
Paying the Orchestra
Wed, 26 Dec 2007, 05:49 pmJust wondering what opinions are out there in regard to the payment (or lack of) for orchestra/band members involved in semi-professional, amateur and community productions of works of music theatre?
In particular I am interested in whether others think there is cause for distinction to be made between different levels of instrumental ability (particularly within a single production - ie. student or 'formally untrained' musicians being paid differently [or not at all] in comparison to professional musicians brought in to 'boost ranks' or cover more difficult parts - as for example happens in school productions)?
And whether distinction can be made by instrument? (as in my experience finding reliable string, harp, oboe, bassoon and 'woodwind' [multi-instrumental] players is quite difficult without serious funding).
If one member of the orchestra is paid, do all the musicians deserve to be paid?
If the Music Director is paid, should the musicians also be paid?
All relevant thoughts, anecdotes, experiences, and opinions are welcome.
Payment
Sat, 19 Jan 2008, 11:42 amWalter Plinge
It is very simple everybody gets paid or no one gets paid, or the argument has no conclusion. There will myriad grey areas for people to mull over for years.
A show does not have to cost millions, only big shows.
Start small and work up. Sure its risky but we know that before we start.
My main concern is the cost of venues and associated staff.
If Pro-Am is here to stay then it is up to the individual to decide if their time is valuable or free.
I have no idea why some people value themselves beneath others or above others, if you feel your Talent, Skill, Ability, Knowledge or Business acumen is valuable then charge for it, if you wish to work for free then that is your decision. I for one will not work unless I get paid.