Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Paying the Orchestra

Wed, 26 Dec 2007, 05:49 pm
funklizard88828 posts in thread
Just wondering what opinions are out there in regard to the payment (or lack of) for orchestra/band members involved in semi-professional, amateur and community productions of works of music theatre? In particular I am interested in whether others think there is cause for distinction to be made between different levels of instrumental ability (particularly within a single production - ie. student or 'formally untrained' musicians being paid differently [or not at all] in comparison to professional musicians brought in to 'boost ranks' or cover more difficult parts - as for example happens in school productions)? And whether distinction can be made by instrument? (as in my experience finding reliable string, harp, oboe, bassoon and 'woodwind' [multi-instrumental] players is quite difficult without serious funding). If one member of the orchestra is paid, do all the musicians deserve to be paid? If the Music Director is paid, should the musicians also be paid? All relevant thoughts, anecdotes, experiences, and opinions are welcome.

Not an Oxymoron

Fri, 18 Jan 2008, 09:26 pm
Yeah regardless it's still not an oxymoron. OK so I'm grammar police but it's not. Military Intelligence (thats a joke) Opaquely Clear Stupidly intelligent They are Oxymorons I've worked on Profit share that has'nt paid out. My partner once did 6 weeks in Shakespeare in London on the Fringe and got a cheque for two pounds. I've also been paid more than I would have got if I was paid a salary. Think twice about the project. Ask to see the books if you think you are being ripped off, if it's a genuine profit share they have to show you. Is that all there is? Well if that's all there is my friend, then let's keep dancing. www.tonymoore.id.au

Thread (28 posts)

← Back to Musicals and Opera