Someone Stop Claude
Tue, 8 Feb 2005, 07:42 pmWalter Plinge41 posts in thread
Someone Stop Claude
Tue, 8 Feb 2005, 07:42 pmI reckon this has gone far enough. If someone doesn't put a stop to this Claude McNamara then i will notify the authorities. It seems that every time a young girl asks for work, he's there. As a perfect example: there is a post from a young girl 13 wanting a job in acting/modeling. The only person to reply is none other than Claude and he states and i quote "I need someone your age to model a product for me.
If you are interested E-mail me with enquiries and a photo at Claude_McNamara@hotmail.com
I hope to meet you soon and make your drem come tru!
Claude"
Now this coming from the guy who was just looking for young 13-17 year old girls to act in his motion picture with the chance of being noticed by hollywood. Get help Claude and get off this site.
If you are interested E-mail me with enquiries and a photo at Claude_McNamara@hotmail.com
I hope to meet you soon and make your drem come tru!
Claude"
Now this coming from the guy who was just looking for young 13-17 year old girls to act in his motion picture with the chance of being noticed by hollywood. Get help Claude and get off this site.
Re: Who me? Yes you!
Fri, 11 Feb 2005, 03:22 pmOk, I've read the whole conversation now about more regulations, and I have a couple of points.
One - only being able to post with a 'registered email' (not hotmail) wouldn't be very helpful. First of all, that doesn't mean that someone isn't suspect, it just means that they pay money to be suspect. And for those of us (including kids who don't have their own personal account, or people without computers and internet at home) without a personal account, that just means we have no way of communicating.
Secondly, putting up 'protocols' - please, how many times do you read those 'I agree not to copywrite...' things when you download a file, or open Word...proven by millions upon millions of illegal pirating. Nobody reads those things, and even if they did, people who are suspect are not going to bother either obeying them or being deterred by them.
Thirdly, anything that you put in place will have a solution to it - in other words, it can be hacked. The internet comes with risks. Many of those risks include logging on, sending money and generally cookie-ing your way through information. There will never be a safe internet site. The best you can do is monitor it, and I applaud the comments and efforts of the site administrators. After all, there is only so much they can do in stopping anonymous postings by inexplicably ambigious people. For all we know this is a hoax.
One - only being able to post with a 'registered email' (not hotmail) wouldn't be very helpful. First of all, that doesn't mean that someone isn't suspect, it just means that they pay money to be suspect. And for those of us (including kids who don't have their own personal account, or people without computers and internet at home) without a personal account, that just means we have no way of communicating.
Secondly, putting up 'protocols' - please, how many times do you read those 'I agree not to copywrite...' things when you download a file, or open Word...proven by millions upon millions of illegal pirating. Nobody reads those things, and even if they did, people who are suspect are not going to bother either obeying them or being deterred by them.
Thirdly, anything that you put in place will have a solution to it - in other words, it can be hacked. The internet comes with risks. Many of those risks include logging on, sending money and generally cookie-ing your way through information. There will never be a safe internet site. The best you can do is monitor it, and I applaud the comments and efforts of the site administrators. After all, there is only so much they can do in stopping anonymous postings by inexplicably ambigious people. For all we know this is a hoax.
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···
- ···