Les Miserables... just for something different :)

Hi Gill

Gill wrote:
-------------------------------
> I can't believe what I inadvertently started by posting a little ad
> for the show, but boy has it been interesting.

I wouldn't be too quick to accept the blame... er credit

;-)

Given the inappropriate company structure, the production was always going to spark this kind of debate.

> Can I conclude...

Probably not.

:-)

> Some of us are already in agreement with Grant and Craig.
> Some of us will have read Grant and Craig's posts very
> carefully and, in the future, will think twice about becoming
> involved in a production where any profits may not necessarily
> be put back into the arts. Some of us will be perfectly happy
> with the way things are and will go on doing whatever shows
> we want to do and not worry about where the money goes.

Some of us may also argue that the latter group is possibly either ill informed or failing to appreciate that companies structured like this damage our chances at future performance opportunities. They're probably the very same group that will complain in a couple of years that there aren't the chances to perform that there used to be.

I wonder if they share a similar lack of foresight with regard to old growth forests?

Or perhaps there's another group of people who, when this show is over, would never like to do another show again and can't wait for the destruction of the amazonian rainforest?

;-)

Incorporation - investing in and protecting our future. A couple of forms and a measly $100. Why would anyone choose not to incorporate? Think about it.



Cheers
Grant