Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

Rent - WA Regal Theatre

Mon, 12 Nov 2007, 11:07 pm
Asta57 posts in thread
Okay so it was bound to happen a review of RENT. Firstly I know that this post is going to cause contraversy and I'm prepared for the barrage of tweenies who will defend their pop idols to the end. So I will say it now... this is only my opinion and I am entitled to it. I also think that when it comes to reviewing I try to be as fair and informative as possible without getting too personal as I know how hard it is to put on a show like this. So here goes. I went and saw the Sunday night (November 11th) performance of RENT. I was very surprised by the small audience considering how much advertising this show has had. Overall I had an enjoyable experience of Rent. It wasn't fantastic and it wasn't crap but it was a nice way to spend a Sunday afternoon. What I didn't like: The first half seemed very slow and very unenlivaning (I know I spelt that wrong). The opening song of Rent was painful to watch. That song is about tension and the music moves at such a pace that something exciting should be going on. But all the characters did was look either at each other or out into the audience and sing their lines. It was boring. I hated the end. Maureen and Joanne rolled up thier coats in such a way that when Mimi lied down to almost die she looked incredibly uncomfortable and it looked terrible. Roger should have had more connection with her at this point but instead he seemed very detatched and apart from her. The girl is dying the least you could do is touch her. There were a lot of instances where the characters sang out into the audience and I mean a lot of instances. Sometimes it worked but a lot of the time it just made me feel very uncomfortable and made the actors look like they had forgotten what they were suppossed to do next. Out tonight was boring. Jaya needed to let go more and be much more sexual. She seemed confined in that small spaced and clumsy climbing on the railings. The voice was fantastic she just needed the moves to match. Ruth was too young to play the mother and her timing was very off in this performance. Which is disspointing cause I know how talented she is. What I loved: Shane Janek. All I can say is wait for act II. He seemed really nervous at the beginning (and almost out of breath in today for you tomorrow for me) but he hit everything perfect in the second act. Joanne! What an amazing voice. She was fantastic. Every time she sang I was amazed but she really shon in Take me or Leave me especially when competing with the star power of Nikki. She was a brilliant actress and singer and her short dance in Tango maureen left Anthony to shame. He couldn't keep up. The guy who played Collin was fantastic. During the reprise of I'll cover you I was nearly in tears. His voice was so full of emotion and he was so beautiful to listen to and watch. an amazing talent. The staging was excellent and allowed the cast to create very distinct areas for the story to unfold. I also liked the idea of having the band on stage. It was very eariee to see the drug dealer guy slink out from under the scaffolding too. The Christmas bell guy stole the show every time he came on stage. Just goes to show you don't need a big part to be a star. He was so funny and had great timing. Good singer too. The voices. The entire cast and I mean entire cast was fantastic vocally. Couldn't fault a single one of them. The Idols: Nikki. I really think that despite a fantastic voice and a really sound performance, she was not right for the part of Maureen. She looked too young and like she was trying too hard to be comfortable with being a bitch and a slut. She also didn't match up with Joanne very well who I loved. But what a voice. Anthony. What a beautiful voice. He was gorgeous to listen to but dreadful to watch. He didn't do anything. It was like watching Ken act. He was very very boring. Shane. I've said enough. Actually I've said enough all together. I could go on for hours. There was so much that I enjoyed about this show and so much I hated. All in all if you have the cash it is worth a look, but I wouldn't make a special trip for it. Love for now Kate. Looking forward to the backlash.

RENT Perth Production

Wed, 14 Nov 2007, 02:57 pm
Walter Plinge
It seems from previous posts when this Cast was originally announced there were already pre-concieved prejudices and yes everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but this is a new fresh production with a new cast and why keep comparing to what happened in years gone by. I have read very positive reviews from people who have been to this production in Bunbury & Perth and some actually went with the idea that they would not like it, but amazingly they were surprised that they did. I expected that the feeling's wouldn't change on this forum as a lot had already closed their minds before they saw the production, and Kate? please why would you think you would be given backlash from tweenies,another preconceived idea. For those of you who are interested I will post the Entertainment Reviewers critique from the "West Australian paper": _______________________________________________________ START "RENT NOT TO BE MISSED Musical: Rent Yellow Glass/Eventainment Regal Theatre Review: William Yeoman Asked to summarise the story of his future Pulitzer prize-winning rock musical in one sentence, Jonathan Larson said: "Rent is about a community celebrating life, in the face of death and AIDS, at the turn of the century." On January 25th, 1996, the night before Rent's first preview, Larson died from an aortic aneurysm. He was only 35. New WA production company Eventainment seems to have taken Larson's carpe diem message - in both an artistic and personal sense - to heart. This is the third major production this year after the enormously successful Hair and a witty, stylish adaptation of the Marriage of Fiagro. Judging by the strength of this production in virtually every department, there seems to be no stopping this company next year. Rent takes Puccini's opera La Boheme and transposes it to modern-day New York's East Village. Instead of tuberculosis raging through the bohemian population, its AIDS. The action takes place within the space of a year, beginning and ending on Christmas Eve, and follows the fortunes of young filmmaker Mark, whose girlfriend Maureen has left him for a woman, Joanne; the rock singer Roger, who falls in love with Mimi; and Collins, who meets and falls in love with a cross-dressing street drummer Angel. These last 4 are HIV positive. Complicating their lives in varying degrees is Benny, the bohemian turned property developer. The cast is a strong one. Anthony Callea is perfect as the somewhat detached Mark, the observer with the camera who cannot help but be caught up in life. Tim Campbell brings a stubborn meloncholy to Roger, while Jaya Henderson makes it quite explicit that Mimi is as unbalanced psychologically as she is physically. Nikki Webster as the fickle Maureen is extraordinary. Her Over the Moon is a real tour-de-force; by contrast, Joanne's strength of character is solidly delineated by Sharon Wisniewski. Shai Yammanee as Collins and Andrew Conaghan as Benny, both so good in Fiagro, again show their adaptness at strong characterisations. Ultimately, however its Shane Janek's doomed Angel that steals the show - a dazzling glitter-ball of energy and high camp. The ensemble is likewise excellent, there is not a weak link among them, and the band, led by music director Simon Halt, lends solid support throughout. Artistic director Chris Kabay has done a marvellous job with the production, playing with visual puns and Christian iconography in order to enrich what is an already powerful emotional experience. This is everything not just a musical, but an opera, should be. Don't miss it."" END: _____________________________________________________ It appears to me that people who are not "RENTHEADS" or in the fringe theatre business will go with an open mind for a night out to be entertained to see this production and absolutely love it, but it appears others who may be in the theatre or trying to get into theatre, seem upset when someone isn't wearing a certain coloured scarf. Why not compare the original production in New York to the film version, many changes I would imagine. There are so many production's of RENT going on all around the world at the moment and I hazzard they are not all unknowns playing the roles. This production is bringing people over from the East Coast to see it, so thats got to be a good thing for Perth Theatre wouldn't you think? I know this show would pack theatres on the East Coast there are many people hanging out to see it in Sydney and Melbourne so why not enjoy live theatre while you can in Perth. I guess I just don't understand why people would go to a show just to sit there and pick it to pieces,I go for the enjoyment.

Thread (57 posts)

← Back to Theatre Reviews