Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

RSC's King Lear

Fri, 22 June 2007, 10:23 pm
Melissa Merchant10 posts in thread
Ok, so I'm attending a conference in Stratford-Upon-Avon this week and was given the opportunity to pre-buy tickets to the Royal Shakespeare Company's production of Macbeth. I chose not to, thinking I may not be able to afford to eat if I did. Yesterday afternoon (the 20th) I decided I could afford it after all and was told that if I went to the theatre and queued I may be able to get return tickets. So, following the directions given by fellow attendees, I head for the theatre and duly queue for the return tickets. When one became available I headed to the counter to purchase it, only at this point realising that I was actually paying for a ticket for King Lear. Somewhat embarrassed and not wanting to admit my fault I paid for the ticket and then bought a programme. Well! Turns out Sir Ian McKellen was playing Lear and I had just scored myself one of the most sought after tickets in Stratford because last night was their last night in town. Tickets, I was told, had been selling for £200 on ebay and I paid a tenth of that! It was on at the Courtyard Theatre (which is where my mistake came in, Macbeth was on at the Swan, just round the corner). The Courtyard was a beautiful theatre and my seat was only 4 rows from the front of the stage and right next to one of the walkways. I could have tripped Sir Ian had I so chosen! It was a long production, but then King Lear is meant to be long and to be honest there was only a couple of scenes which seemed to drag. The show started at 7pm, due to its length, and finished at 11.30pm. The costumes were lavish, I would have taken on Cordelia for her stunning dress, if I thought I would actually fit into it. The set was basic, with any pieces needed being brought on by the mechanicals. The actors made use of the full stage (and it's huge) as well as the two walkways which run from the stage to the auditorium and out to the foyer. There's nothing like having a well toned actor, wearing only a loin cloth crouched in front of you :) The acting was . . . interesting. I mean that nicely, really! Some brilliant interpretations of the text and some . . . interesting ones. A stand out (and I will get to Sir Ian, I promise) was John Heffernan who played Oswald, Goneril's servant who fights with Kent. A brilliant example of what a talented actor can do with, what on paper seems like, a smaller role. Frances Barber as Goneril was also a highlight, showing such genuine emotion at the curses of her father that you could, almost, forgive her later actions. Monica Dolan, who played Regan, had one of the most interesting takes on the character I have ever seen. At first appearing more like a harmless lush who is lead by her sister, Dolan's Regan then becomes something much sinister. Her gleeful laughter and shrieks of delight as her husband plucks Gloucester's eyes from his head were chilling. Both Jonathan Hyde, as Kent, and Ben Meyjes, as Edgar, essentially had to play two roles. I felt that Hyde was more successful in this, his characters were so completely different in accent, stature and manner that it was like watching a completely different man. That being said, Ben Meyjes moved so brilliantly as Tom that it didn't matter so much that he didn't alter his voice for the role. I'm pretty sure that the actor has also had dance training and this shows. Romola Garai's Cordelia, for me, didn't work. She was just too emotional. This is not a criticism of the actress, who played the emotion brilliantly (standing right next to me, I could see the tears as they silently ran down her cheeks while she listened to her father curse and cast her out). The fault, I think, lies with the Trevor Nunn's direction. With so much angst at the start, poor Cordelia had nowhere to go when things got really bad. Philip Winchester as Edmund was an interesting one. There was nothing at all technically wrong with his performance, I just didn't buy it. He was trying, just that little bit too hard, to convince me that he was a villain. Still, the audience seemed to enjoy what he was doing, so the fault may lie with me :) Now, Sir Ian. What can I say? Within about a minute I forgot I was watching Gandalf (or Magneto, if you swing that way) and completely bought his Lear. The ease with which he slipped into the role is really an acting lesson in itself. He was so comfortable with the language, played it so naturally that I was enthralled. There was nothing predictable in his interpretation, you literally didn't know what he would do next. His death (sorry if I spoilt the end for anyone) was . . . interesting. At the time I didn't like the "Howl, howl, howl" scene, I felt it needed to be bigger, his grief stronger. Yet as he slowly slipped away (as if from a stroke, you could see his facial muscles start to go, then his body and finally he just stopped breathing) I realised that he was giving a performance of a man who had lost everything, his kingdom, his wits and finally his daughter. McKellen's Lear never regains his wits, he is mad right until the end and in the vein then delivery of "howl, howl, howl" fits perfectly. It's not often that I use the word genius, but there is no doubt that last night I got to witness genius at work. Oh and did I mention he gets naked? Anyway, that's enough from me. Sorry if I've rambled too much, I'm just still so energised by the performance :) Melissa Merchant PS Apparently the Macbeth wasn't that good anyway.

Thread (10 posts)

Melissa MerchantFri, 22 June 2007, 10:23 pm
Ok, so I'm attending a conference in Stratford-Upon-Avon this week and was given the opportunity to pre-buy tickets to the Royal Shakespeare Company's production of Macbeth. I chose not to, thinking I may not be able to afford to eat if I did. Yesterday afternoon (the 20th) I decided I could afford it after all and was told that if I went to the theatre and queued I may be able to get return tickets. So, following the directions given by fellow attendees, I head for the theatre and duly queue for the return tickets. When one became available I headed to the counter to purchase it, only at this point realising that I was actually paying for a ticket for King Lear. Somewhat embarrassed and not wanting to admit my fault I paid for the ticket and then bought a programme. Well! Turns out Sir Ian McKellen was playing Lear and I had just scored myself one of the most sought after tickets in Stratford because last night was their last night in town. Tickets, I was told, had been selling for £200 on ebay and I paid a tenth of that! It was on at the Courtyard Theatre (which is where my mistake came in, Macbeth was on at the Swan, just round the corner). The Courtyard was a beautiful theatre and my seat was only 4 rows from the front of the stage and right next to one of the walkways. I could have tripped Sir Ian had I so chosen! It was a long production, but then King Lear is meant to be long and to be honest there was only a couple of scenes which seemed to drag. The show started at 7pm, due to its length, and finished at 11.30pm. The costumes were lavish, I would have taken on Cordelia for her stunning dress, if I thought I would actually fit into it. The set was basic, with any pieces needed being brought on by the mechanicals. The actors made use of the full stage (and it's huge) as well as the two walkways which run from the stage to the auditorium and out to the foyer. There's nothing like having a well toned actor, wearing only a loin cloth crouched in front of you :) The acting was . . . interesting. I mean that nicely, really! Some brilliant interpretations of the text and some . . . interesting ones. A stand out (and I will get to Sir Ian, I promise) was John Heffernan who played Oswald, Goneril's servant who fights with Kent. A brilliant example of what a talented actor can do with, what on paper seems like, a smaller role. Frances Barber as Goneril was also a highlight, showing such genuine emotion at the curses of her father that you could, almost, forgive her later actions. Monica Dolan, who played Regan, had one of the most interesting takes on the character I have ever seen. At first appearing more like a harmless lush who is lead by her sister, Dolan's Regan then becomes something much sinister. Her gleeful laughter and shrieks of delight as her husband plucks Gloucester's eyes from his head were chilling. Both Jonathan Hyde, as Kent, and Ben Meyjes, as Edgar, essentially had to play two roles. I felt that Hyde was more successful in this, his characters were so completely different in accent, stature and manner that it was like watching a completely different man. That being said, Ben Meyjes moved so brilliantly as Tom that it didn't matter so much that he didn't alter his voice for the role. I'm pretty sure that the actor has also had dance training and this shows. Romola Garai's Cordelia, for me, didn't work. She was just too emotional. This is not a criticism of the actress, who played the emotion brilliantly (standing right next to me, I could see the tears as they silently ran down her cheeks while she listened to her father curse and cast her out). The fault, I think, lies with the Trevor Nunn's direction. With so much angst at the start, poor Cordelia had nowhere to go when things got really bad. Philip Winchester as Edmund was an interesting one. There was nothing at all technically wrong with his performance, I just didn't buy it. He was trying, just that little bit too hard, to convince me that he was a villain. Still, the audience seemed to enjoy what he was doing, so the fault may lie with me :) Now, Sir Ian. What can I say? Within about a minute I forgot I was watching Gandalf (or Magneto, if you swing that way) and completely bought his Lear. The ease with which he slipped into the role is really an acting lesson in itself. He was so comfortable with the language, played it so naturally that I was enthralled. There was nothing predictable in his interpretation, you literally didn't know what he would do next. His death (sorry if I spoilt the end for anyone) was . . . interesting. At the time I didn't like the "Howl, howl, howl" scene, I felt it needed to be bigger, his grief stronger. Yet as he slowly slipped away (as if from a stroke, you could see his facial muscles start to go, then his body and finally he just stopped breathing) I realised that he was giving a performance of a man who had lost everything, his kingdom, his wits and finally his daughter. McKellen's Lear never regains his wits, he is mad right until the end and in the vein then delivery of "howl, howl, howl" fits perfectly. It's not often that I use the word genius, but there is no doubt that last night I got to witness genius at work. Oh and did I mention he gets naked? Anyway, that's enough from me. Sorry if I've rambled too much, I'm just still so energised by the performance :) Melissa Merchant PS Apparently the Macbeth wasn't that good anyway.
NaSat, 23 June 2007, 11:37 am

Pity. I saw the version of

Pity. I saw the version of this performance (in Stratford by the RSC) with Sir Nigel Hawthorne. I don't even like Shakespeare (don't get me started), but it was one of the best shows I've seen in my life. The entire performance was co-directed by a very famous Japanese director, and was infused with a lot of Asian style, costuming, set, etc. I had hoped that this was what they were going to bring to Melbourne in July, but from the sounds of the above, not likely. Sticky Apple Legs www.freewebs.com/stickyapplelegs Puppets in Melbourne www.thepromptcopy.com/pip
LogosSat, 23 June 2007, 12:20 pm

I think the production you

I think the production you are talking about Na was co-directed by Suzuki (can't remember his christian name) who used some of the images from Ran by Kurosawa in his Lear. He brough a brilliant Macbeth to the Adelaide Festival some many years ago. He has always claimed that Lear and Macbeth are the only two Shakespeares that resonate to Japanese audiences Is that all there is? Well if that's all there is my friend, then let's keep dancing. www.tonymoore.id.au
Sean BSat, 23 June 2007, 01:19 pm

I've seen images and seti

I've seen images and set designs of the Japanese King Lear that I think you're talking about in a book about directors. Thought the sets and costumes looked great for it- I was studying King Lear at the time. I believe the Sir Ian version has sold for it's Melbourne showing...but I've heard it's going to Ballarat. Anyone know? I wanted to see it, I love King Lear. ____________________________________________________________ Currently working on: "Boy Banned" a fusion of live acting, video footage, corny songs, syncronised dancing boys and egos! JULY 2007, ticket information coming soon!!!
NaSat, 23 June 2007, 02:11 pm

Yes, Suzuki! I have the

Yes, Suzuki! I have the program for it somewhere... It was really quite beautiful. (Perhaps this is the reason I liked the production. I enjoy Japanese performances far more than I enjoy Shakespeare) Sticky Apple Legs www.freewebs.com/stickyapplelegs Puppets in Melbourne www.thepromptcopy.com/pip
Walter PlingeSat, 23 June 2007, 09:29 pm

I'm off to see this

I'm off to see this production in Melbourne in August. Good to hear it's likely to be worth the cost. But you didn't mention Sylvester "Used to play Doctor Who" McCoy as the Fool!!
Melissa MerchantMon, 25 June 2007, 05:29 pm

"But you didn't mention

"But you didn't mention Sylvester "Used to play Doctor Who" McCoy as the Fool!!" That would be because I'm still not sure if I liked him or not! He was entertaining,for sure, but I couldn't hear a lot of what he was saying because she spoke so fast. That being said, it gave the impression that the interaction between him and Lear was private and I was eavesdropping on something I had no right to be listening to. So, I can't decide yet. I admist I cared more about his death (sorry again for the spoiler) than Cordelia's. Melissa
Walter PlingeFri, 10 Aug 2007, 04:07 pm

LEar in Melbourne- the Fool

Funnily enough, the night I saw LEar, the audience loved the Fol - he got buckets of laughter. HE was superlative in his resentation of thiso-so-bery impt charcter, and in his relationsip to Lear. DO you know the history of Fools to thier Kings? VIP andwith the commedia dell'arte dramatic link also.. Anyhow, I really liked Edgar, he was masetrfulin a 20-something kind of a way, which is good to see as we need to see those young males (a la Mercutio etc) who get the lanh=guage on their tongue and play with it to the audience, as they are the future Lear/Gloucester's anyhow. I'm from the MElb S/Peare society and we were split on Cordelia too- in the end I liked her, high emotionalism but this is COrdelia all over see. final scenes. Goneril - we could hardly hear a squeak emanate from her mouth- should have had understudy even though I really wanted to see her act. What about William Gaunt? Ian was great and achieved true transcendance of self-into-art/character, yet we all felt William Gaunt's Gloucester was strong in voice and in body, and that he would ahve been an interesting Lear also. But Sir ian- I ate it up. He was really of the role- what an acheivement for an actor in his performing life. Congrats to yu Ian- you showed us fallible Lear, warts, genitals and all!
Walter PlingeSat, 11 Aug 2007, 04:48 pm

King Lear and The Seagull

Me say this, William Gaunt delivered every aspect of both plays, Sylvester McCoy delivered as the Fool and Sir Ian McKellen, well he was a sight to behold lengthwise and voice wise. Mr Gaunt as King Lear, perhaps his approach would be that different to Sir Ian, but then again he would have to do what Sir Ian had to do ..wouldn't he, and but would he? *L* Forgive me, it's all supposition. Thoroughly enjoyable both productions in Melbourne and would not want it any other way. Wish I could see the production in New York. Maybe I can win lotto! Ditto
Walter PlingeSat, 11 Aug 2007, 04:50 pm

King Lear and the Seagull

Me say this, William Gaunt delivered every aspect of both plays, Sylvester McCoy delivered as the Fool and Sir Ian McKellen, well he was a sight to behold lengthwise and voice wise. Mr Gaunt as King Lear, perhaps his approach would be that different to Sir Ian, but then again he would have to do what Sir Ian had to do ..wouldn't he, and but would he? *L* Forgive me, it's all supposition. Thoroughly enjoyable both productions in Melbourne and would not want it any other way. Wish I could see the production in New York. Maybe I can win lotto! Ditto
← Back to Theatre Reviews