Press Release Re: Effie Crump
Wed, 1 Sept 1999, 09:15 pmGrant Malcolm8 posts in thread
Press Release Re: Effie Crump
Wed, 1 Sept 1999, 09:15 pmThe following Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance press release courtesy of Jeff Watkins - thanks Jeff. Subject to permission being granted, there should be a copy of Steve's letter to the Minister et al. available here soon. PRESS RELEASE. UNION DEMANDS ARTS MINISTER STEPS ASIDE. Minister for the Arts Peter Foss has outraged members of WAs performing arts community with comments made to The West Australian(Aug 28).In that article Mr Foss is quoted as saying that "...tax-payer funding of the Arts was for the benefit of audiences, not as an employment subsidy for Actors..."."This is a completely absurd thing to say. Mr Foss seems intent on driving a wedge between audience and performers, when in the context of a theatre performance these two groups are dependant on each other" Branch Secretary of the M.E.A.A. Steven Shaw said."Reading between the lines, Foss is obviously of the opinion that WAs professional performers are not justified a wage like any other employee and his comment infers professional Actors to be mere hobbyists"."Without doubt his statement indicates a complete lack of understanding or appreciation of the dedication, training and expertise required for a professional career in the Theatre"."Perhaps the Minister should consider who it is that subsidises his own employment. He may even wish to consider exchanging his income for the $11,000 per annum average of the professional performer. We know what the short answer to that would be," Mr Shaw said.Most recently the Minister refused assistance to the professional company, the Effie Crump Theatre Company, which had made a very modest request for funds to guarantee their survival."In the past, Mr Foss has been prepared to bail out struggling arts companies, yet his decision not to assist Effie Crump will see the closure of a company that has averaged over 6 productions each year of the past decade. This is an example of his inconsistent and even dictatorial approach to the management of the Arts portfolio."It was a Foss decision that forced the closure of the State Theatre Company resulting in an audience loss that has never been recovered. His decision regarding Effie Crump will see an audience loss of a further 18,500 people per year."Both of these decisions make a mockery of his statement that tax-payer funding is for the benefit of audiences. Minister Foss has lost contact with this portfolio and professional performers have lost faith in him and his government. It is time he stood aside and allowed the Arts portfolio to be managed by someone with an interest in the Arts prospering and flourishing not withering into obscurity," Mr Shaw said.Further Information: Branch Secretary Steven Shaw: 9227 7924 (w)
Grant MalcolmWed, 1 Sept 1999, 09:15 pm
The following Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance press release courtesy of Jeff Watkins - thanks Jeff. Subject to permission being granted, there should be a copy of Steve's letter to the Minister et al. available here soon. PRESS RELEASE. UNION DEMANDS ARTS MINISTER STEPS ASIDE. Minister for the Arts Peter Foss has outraged members of WAs performing arts community with comments made to The West Australian(Aug 28).In that article Mr Foss is quoted as saying that "...tax-payer funding of the Arts was for the benefit of audiences, not as an employment subsidy for Actors..."."This is a completely absurd thing to say. Mr Foss seems intent on driving a wedge between audience and performers, when in the context of a theatre performance these two groups are dependant on each other" Branch Secretary of the M.E.A.A. Steven Shaw said."Reading between the lines, Foss is obviously of the opinion that WAs professional performers are not justified a wage like any other employee and his comment infers professional Actors to be mere hobbyists"."Without doubt his statement indicates a complete lack of understanding or appreciation of the dedication, training and expertise required for a professional career in the Theatre"."Perhaps the Minister should consider who it is that subsidises his own employment. He may even wish to consider exchanging his income for the $11,000 per annum average of the professional performer. We know what the short answer to that would be," Mr Shaw said.Most recently the Minister refused assistance to the professional company, the Effie Crump Theatre Company, which had made a very modest request for funds to guarantee their survival."In the past, Mr Foss has been prepared to bail out struggling arts companies, yet his decision not to assist Effie Crump will see the closure of a company that has averaged over 6 productions each year of the past decade. This is an example of his inconsistent and even dictatorial approach to the management of the Arts portfolio."It was a Foss decision that forced the closure of the State Theatre Company resulting in an audience loss that has never been recovered. His decision regarding Effie Crump will see an audience loss of a further 18,500 people per year."Both of these decisions make a mockery of his statement that tax-payer funding is for the benefit of audiences. Minister Foss has lost contact with this portfolio and professional performers have lost faith in him and his government. It is time he stood aside and allowed the Arts portfolio to be managed by someone with an interest in the Arts prospering and flourishing not withering into obscurity," Mr Shaw said.Further Information: Branch Secretary Steven Shaw: 9227 7924 (w)
Walter PlingeThu, 2 Sept 1999, 11:24 am
Survival of the Cleverest...
Hi Grant,I would be fascinated to know the basis on which Mr. Foss decides which arts organisations are/ are not worthy of his patronage and, therefore, state government funding.It seems that there are some theatre companies in Perth who thrive on state funding, despite the 'uneven' quality of the work they're producing, and variable audience responses and audience numbers.Is there a reasonable, logical rationale for funding arts organisations - or does Mr. Foss just enjoy the indulgences of his lofty position and have 'little favourites' (";oh, we do so love our little theatre companies and their charming, little actors..";)It just seems to me somewhat suspicious when there are a couple of seemingly extremely 'healthy' (financially, not necessarily artistically or adminstratively) organisations in Perth doing 'very nicely thankyou dear Mr. Foss' while others are being allowed to fall apart. Triennial funding anyone? Yes, that will do nicely...Just keep 'buffing up' that international reputation and we'll see you right, know wha'I mean, eh?...Any views?JC
LabrugThu, 2 Sept 1999, 01:58 pm
Re: Survival of the Cleverest...
EMAILNOTICES>no> Is there a reasonable, logical rationale for funding arts organisations> - or does Mr. Foss just enjoy the indulgences of his lofty position> and have 'little favourites' (";oh, we do so love our little theatre> companies and their charming, little actors..";)Or is it yet another ";Minister-without-clue"; posting just to fill numbers? The Parlimentarians follow an Old Age protocol insisting that appropriately qualified politicians are put into positions where their experience and qualifications amount to absolutely nothing. They then proceed to make bad decisions that could have worked had they been placed in another department.It appears to be strictly followed here in WA. Maybe we should all move to Victoria, at least they can prepare for the mistakes there. Our warning systems don't appear to be working very well.Jeff ";AHWOOOGAH!"; Watkins
Walter PlingeThu, 2 Sept 1999, 05:09 pm
Re: Survival of the Cleverest...
EMAILNOTICES>noYou know, that letter might be better directed at the Ministry of the Arts or Ron Banks or someone who might be able to do something. We need to put pressure on those people for the decisions they make.
LabrugThu, 2 Sept 1999, 06:46 pm
Re: Survival of the Cleverest...
EMAILNOTICES>no> You know, that letter might be better directed at the Ministry> of the Arts or Ron Banks or someone who might be able to do something.> We need to put pressure on those people for the decisions they make.>Agreed. Either LOTS of letters or one letter with a very LARGE list of supporting names. Personally, I like the idea of Lots of Letters. Must be the Sadist in me.Jeff ";Opening Word"; Watkins
LabrugThu, 2 Sept 1999, 06:56 pm
Let's try that again.
EMAILNOTICES>noPRESS RELEASE.UNION DEMANDS ARTS MINISTER STEPS ASIDE.Minister for the Arts Peter Foss has outraged members of WA's performing arts community with comments made to The West Australian(Aug 28).In that article Mr Foss is quoted as saying that ";...tax-payer funding of the Arts was for the benefit of audiences, not as an employment subsidy for Actors...";.";This is a completely absurd thing to say. Mr Foss seems intent on driving a wedge between audience and performers, when in the context of a theatre performance these two groups are dependant on each other"; Branch Secretary of the M.E.A.A. Steven Shaw said.";Reading between the lines, Foss is obviously of the opinion that WA's professional performers are not justified a wage like any other employee and his comment infers professional Actors to be mere hobbyists";.";Without doubt his statement indicates a complete lack of understanding or appreciation of the dedication, training and expertise required for a professional career in the Theatre";.";Perhaps the Minister should consider who it is that subsidises his own employment. He may even wish to consider exchanging his income for the $11,000 per annum average of the professional performer. We know what the short answer to that would be,"; Mr Shaw said.Most recently the Minister refused assistance to the professional company, the Effie Crump Theatre Company, which had made a very modest request for funds to guarantee their survival.";In the past, Mr Foss has been prepared to bail out struggling arts companies, yet his decision not to assist Effie Crump will see the closure of a company that has averaged over 6 productions each year of the past decade. This is an example of his inconsistent and even dictatorial approach to the management of the Arts portfolio.";It was a Foss decision that forced the closure of the State Theatre Company resulting in an audience loss that has never been recovered. His decision regarding Effie Crump will see an audience loss of a further 18,500 people per year.";Both of these decisions make a mockery of his statement that tax-payer funding is for the benefit of audiences. Minister Foss has lost contact with this portfolio and professional performers have lost faith in him and his government. It is time he stood aside and allowed the Arts portfolio to be managed by someone with an interest in the Arts prospering and flourishing not withering into obscurity,"; Mr Shaw said.Further Information: Branch Secretary Steven Shaw: 9227 7924 (w)
JoeMcThu, 2 Sept 1999, 08:21 pm
Re: Survival of the Cleverest...
> Agreed. Either LOTS of letters or one letter with a very LARGE> list of supporting names. Personally, I like the idea of Lots of Letters.> Must be the Sadist in me.> Jeff ";Opening Word"; WatkinsEmail him on his web site - give him piles and the _ _ _ _'s (techno-WOOD)That reminds me about the one about; ";the 'Wooden Horse'- wood'n ssh...IT?";Joe McCabe
LabrugFri, 3 Sept 1999, 08:38 am
Re: Survival of the Cleverest...
EMAILNOTICES>no> Email him on his web site - give him piles and the _ _ _ _'s> (techno-WOOD)> That reminds me about the one about; ";the 'Wooden Horse'-> wood'n ssh...IT?";Great idea. Let's flood his server.Jeff ";Trojian"; Watkins