The pointlessness of existence

> haven't they discovered recently that it is not negative electrons> but "positive holes" flowing from positive to negative that> constitute electric current? Where's our resident physicist, Neil> McDonald, when i need him? Hey Dr Mac, you listening?? Help me out> here!> Cheers> GrantNot sure, has the jury come back on this one?So if it has and the holes are positive - would it stand that not-holes are negative?Can a hole move from hole to hole - stupid me! it would then be half a hole or a not-whole?If it became many holes joined to become one, would it be 'the big hole theory' or do they just hang around together?On the other hand - can different holes together become repelant or simply unattractive?I am just complete holed up on this one.Originally, the Convention was Actual flow from positive to negative, then it became only actual from negative to positive, leaving the convention in place, from positive to negative.- "must have been cheaper to do it this way", being the model of understanding - so it has come full circle, can that be right, that would mean being pro-active is nothing more than creating holes and therefore pre-negative as a support as the neutral surrounding IT.So what must come first the negative or positive?All I know is this hole is getting deap - anyone! a tourch, 2 sticks - an eveready battery then?????Paging Dr Mac ........Joe "no lights - but I am home - I think?"