Theatre Australia

your portal for australian theatre

The pointlessness of existence

Fri, 24 Sept 1999, 08:07 pm
Walter Plinge6 posts in thread
EMAILNOTICES>noOnce I knew someone who loved theatre. That person had a zest for life and enjoyed his time and liked the people they worked with.And then, somewhere along the line, it all turned to shit.Doesn't see them anymore, doesn't go to theatre, doesn't act any more. It all fell apart. The thought was they were friends but now it appears they were fairweather friends.Reading all this "glowing positivism" is completely soul destroying.

Thread (6 posts)

Walter PlingeFri, 24 Sept 1999, 08:07 pm
EMAILNOTICES>noOnce I knew someone who loved theatre. That person had a zest for life and enjoyed his time and liked the people they worked with.And then, somewhere along the line, it all turned to shit.Doesn't see them anymore, doesn't go to theatre, doesn't act any more. It all fell apart. The thought was they were friends but now it appears they were fairweather friends.Reading all this "glowing positivism" is completely soul destroying.
JoeMcSun, 26 Sept 1999, 04:51 pm

Re: The pointlessness of existence

> It all fell apart. The thought was they were friends but> now it appears they were fairweather friends.> Reading all this "glowing positivism" is completely> soul destroying.As I have said before - Mike - we need the negative to create a working circuit, otherwise it won't glow postive or otherwise.We cannot survive on all being positive or negative, but we can with just 1 negative and as many postives IT will support. IT does not flow from positive, IT flows from negative and having at least one to work with - otherwise nothing happens, eventually cycling like the AWK AWK Bird and flying up it self - IT's the same being negative only.You make the circuit and the chioce of how you engineer IT to work for you and in turn others. So now you have spat the dummy, pick IT up wipe IT put IT in your pocket and get ready to spit IT again anew!!!!Joe "existing" McCabe
Grant MalcolmSun, 26 Sept 1999, 07:38 pm

Re: The pointlessness of existence

aw, Mikedon't rain on our parade> So now you have spat the dummy, pick> IT up wipe IT put IT in your pocket and get ready to spit IT again> anew!!!!i'm with Joe :)and Joe, i think you might find that IT actually flows the other wayhaven't they discovered recently that it is not negative electrons but "positive holes" flowing from positive to negative that constitute electric current? Where's our resident physicist, Neil McDonald, when i need him? Hey Dr Mac, you listening?? Help me out here!CheersGrant
JoeMcMon, 27 Sept 1999, 01:12 am

Re: The pointness of IT'less

Sorry Mike,I tend to get side tracked!Has your problem or the the one you know who has a problem! - been helped by sharing or do you want to kick the dummy around for a bit longer - it does help one focus on IT with more practice.Joe
LabrugMon, 27 Sept 1999, 10:01 am

Re: The pointlessness of existence

EMAILNOTICES>no> Once I knew someone who loved theatre. That person had a zest> for life and enjoyed his time and liked the people they worked with.>> And then, somewhere along the line, it all turned to shit.I would hazard a guess that this person lives a very depressing life, accidentally stumbled across this site and either became jealous or is simplya cynical individual and doesn't like others to have a better time than he/she does. My brother was a bit like that once.Why do I say He/she? Because this site allows anonymity or disguise work if you like (it also provides other nasty things I won't go into) the person could provide anyname they wanted.It is entirely possible that the description was of the individual itself!"Don't Let the Bast^&@$ get You Down"Jeff "Happy Go-lucky Lad" Watkins
JoeMcMon, 27 Sept 1999, 12:52 pm

Re: The point_____ness of existence

> haven't they discovered recently that it is not negative electrons> but "positive holes" flowing from positive to negative that> constitute electric current? Where's our resident physicist, Neil> McDonald, when i need him? Hey Dr Mac, you listening?? Help me out> here!> Cheers> GrantNot sure, has the jury come back on this one?So if it has and the holes are positive - would it stand that not-holes are negative?Can a hole move from hole to hole - stupid me! it would then be half a hole or a not-whole?If it became many holes joined to become one, would it be 'the big hole theory' or do they just hang around together?On the other hand - can different holes together become repelant or simply unattractive?I am just complete holed up on this one.Originally, the Convention was Actual flow from positive to negative, then it became only actual from negative to positive, leaving the convention in place, from positive to negative.- "must have been cheaper to do it this way", being the model of understanding - so it has come full circle, can that be right, that would mean being pro-active is nothing more than creating holes and therefore pre-negative as a support as the neutral surrounding IT.So what must come first the negative or positive?All I know is this hole is getting deap - anyone! a tourch, 2 sticks - an eveready battery then?????Paging Dr Mac ........Joe "no lights - but I am home - I think?"
← Back to Green Room Gossip